The Venezuelan opposition has warned that Chavista justice cannot prevent the publication of the detailed results of the 28J.

Venezuela’s main opposition coalition Democratic Unity Platform (PUD), denounced this Saturday that Electoral Chamber The follower Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), compatible with the system Nicolas Madurolacks the power to prevent National Electoral Council The CNE publishes the detailed results of the presidential elections held on July 28.

The PUD stressed in a statement that the failure to disclose this data contradicts the timetable established by the CNE and harms the auditability of the process. The Electoral Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, under the supervision of Chavista Carcelia RodriguezThe official results that certified Nicolás Maduro as president are being “verified.”

The Democratic Union Party confirms that its candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutiawas the real winner of the election, and insisted that the publication of results by polling stations was crucial to ensuring the transparency and credibility of the process. In addition, he accused the National Electoral Commission of unjustifiably boycotting post-vote audits.

“All Venezuelans and the democratic world that watches us impartially know what happened on July 28. Edmundo González Urrutia won the presidential election by a landslide.The opposition coalition said.

Likewise, the Democratic Unionist Party stressed that despite the promise of the head of the National Electoral Council, Elvis Amorusoto publish detailed data in the hours following the publication of the official results, and these commitments have not been fulfilled 13 days after the announcement. The coalition described any attempt to “And some alleged results were placed under the cloak of blackout that were not audited or classified by the polling office.“

In its statement, the PYD also expressed concern about the process carried out by the Supreme Court of Justice, which appears to be aimed at “certifying the results based on unverified or classified records.” They considered it unacceptable that proper procedure was restricted and electoral transparency was obstructed by practices they described as opaque.

Furthermore, the PYD accused the electoral chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of “exploiting” the process to disqualify candidates from the elections. Copies of audit recordsnecessary to ensure transparency. For her part, the President of the Supreme Court of Justice, Cariclia Rodriguez, defended the chamber’s procedures, stressing that “highly qualified personnel” were working with the highest technical standards in verifying the validity of the results, although she did not provide details or deadlines for the validation of this process.

Rodriguez also assured the diplomatic corps accredited to the country that the National Electoral Commission had provided “in a timely manner all the requirements related to the process.” In addition, he rejected the claims of the UPD, arguing that the coalition had only published 83.5% of the voting records on a website.

Meanwhile, Carter Center He pointed out that the elections could not be considered democratic, because they did not meet the standards set to ensure transparency and legitimacy. The Maduro regime interpreted this statement as support for the “coup” it claims to be facing.

In this tense context, the Venezuelan opposition continues to demand respect for legal procedures to ensure popular sovereignty and transparency in the electoral process, denouncing what it considers legal maneuvers aimed at consolidating electoral fraud in Maduro’s favor.

TSJ The opposition candidate declared in contempt Edmundo Gonzalez UrrutiaWho did not appear in court after the Chavista court summoned him because it considered the results announced by the National Electoral Council, also allied with Chavismo, on election night in Venezuela fraudulent.

“It has been recorded that former candidate Edmundo González Urrutia did not appear and therefore did not comply with the summons, ignoring with his inaction the mandate of this, the highest instance of the controversial electoral authority of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. “Consequently, he did not commit to registering the minutes of the investigation, the list of witnesses or any electoral materials,” Rodríguez added.

(With information from EFE)