The controversial study that asserts that the universe is a living organism capable of thinking and learning – Enseñame de Ciencia

Every day, new theories about our universe appear. Recently, one is rapidly gaining ground: an idea espoused by a growing number of scientists, which claims that the universe is not just a vast, seemingly inert space where energy and matter interact in a random way governed by physical and quantum laws that we don’t. Even being able to fully explain it. This theory puts an end to the traditional concept of space and allows us to redefine our understanding of the universe and even unify Einstein’s relativity and quantum mechanics. We talked about the idea that the universe could be a giant neural network, a living organism capable of learning and evolving.

Neuroscientist Bobby Azarian provides us with an in-depth analysis of this theory, which was originally proposed by theoretical physicist Vitaly Fankorin, but has its roots in the concept of a universe capable of behaving like the human brain, formulated by the pre-Socratic philosopher Anaxagoras (500-428 BC)

In the same way that terrestrial organisms are large, complex structures made up of chemical compounds, molecules, atoms, and elementary particles, the universe would have followed a similar path, evolving into a neural network with the capacity for reasoning. This does not mean that the universe has a holistic level of consciousness in and of itself, we still do not know it and it is one of the unknowns to investigate.

What does this theory state?

The theory suggests that the universe could be a neural network, a system of interconnected nodes similar to the neural structures of the human brain. According to Vanchorin, “The dynamics of the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics and the theory of gravity, which are very similar to the laws that govern neural networks.” If the universe can be thought of as a neural network, then Einstein’s theory of relativity can be unified with quantum mechanics, because these two behaviors are highly compatible within neural networks.

Azarian cites theoretical physicist Sabenhosenfelder, who supports the idea that the universe can be a thinking entity, because according to her, there is an increasing number of scientific evidence that points to The interconnectedness of the cosmic nodes And some evidence from a study by Frontiers in Physics. According to the study, although the relevant physical interactions between the brain and the cosmic filament are very different, observing them through microscopic and telescopic techniques has captured a similar morphology, because they are similar mechanisms that can allow the cosmos to behave like a neural network. This indicates that the universe could act like a cosmic computer capable of transmitting information, learning and evolving.

According to Azarian, there is more troubling empirical evidence. According to a study by Science, it describes how jets of particles and radiation emitted from black holes seem to align with the cosmic web in an inexplicable way, since the black holes that mysteriously feed quasars have the same spin axis as their neighbors, despite being billions of light years away. . These results indicate that the universe is much more complex and dynamic than previously thought, so if the universe is just an idea, Hossenfelder says, we are not the only thinking entities in it. So we are “thoughts within a thought”.