History has shown that a wealthy ruler, a billionaire, does not guarantee anything. Nor does following the aristocratic tradition defended by Aristotle guarantee that he cannot steal or be corrupt. With the arrival of Downing StreetHe is the youngest and richest prime minister in modern history, also married to a wealthy heiress, reignited the debate. There are those who admire Rishi Sunak’s suits, valued at €5,000, as a value to consider. Others argue, from positions more ideological than social class, that ostentation of wealth cannot be adapted to contemporary times. Additionally, in the UK, social origin does not mean defense under policies favorable to individual and business liberty. A typical example: Margaret Thatcher, daughter of a shopkeeper.
Donald Trump ousted Democrat John F. Kennedy as the richest president of the United States when he took office. Then Trump praised a fortune estimated at 3 thousand million dollars for being the son of a culture of effort, Based on his knowledge of how to speculate in real estate and being an expert financial engineer using debt to fuel his business. JFK, on the contrary, was the heir to one of the richest family epics in the country. At his side, his Republican challenger Richard Nixon in the 1960 election came from a family of farmers (they had a lemon field) that closed with the Great Depression. His parents also ran a grocery store and a gas station. For Kennedy, devoting himself to politics was a hobby. As it was in the Bush saga or the Roosevelt family. Remembrance: The fathers of American independence – from the north and south of the continent – were big landowners. Compelling reasons when it comes to leading and trusting their “operations”.
Snouck’s being wealthy would have no bearing on the success of his government. At least, when his term ends, he won’t have an urgent need to devote himself to holding €400,000 conferences or participating on corporate boards that have helped swell the coffers of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair or Barack Obama, the trio. More ex-politicians are listed on the planet. In Argentina, one of the distinguishing features of Mauricio Macri before he became president was that he was the son and heir of one of the country’s richest businessmen, Franco Macri, whose reputation as a builder has long raised many questions.
In Spain there were no rich heads of government. With a long political career in their party apparatus, coming from classes of state officials in some cases, not even their subsequent income equaled that of the Anglo-Saxons or some Latin Americans. Yes, there were ministers who had a comfortable economic position before they took office. And theThe most famous of them in recent times has been the former Minister of Economy, Rodrigo Rato, who ended his career and prestige in the extinct Bankia.. Luis de Guindos, Rato’s opponent who even belongs to the same party and today’s vice president of the European Central Bank, was another example. In his autobiography, his time at the bankrupt Lehman Brothers. And if we go back a little to recent history, this is a case that deserves no further comment. Catalonia had a “chief” of a general with a suitable fortune: Jordi Pujol. Did his estate, which he was trying discreetly to pretend, ensured that his family would not interfere with the box?
Related news
“Creator. Devoted pop culture specialist. Certified web fanatic. Unapologetic coffee lover.”