Fouradore-Duncan Agreement: The Foreign Office backed down in every way The national government canceled the benefits granted to the United Kingdom in the Malvinas

There are no flights to Falkland IslandsSanctions were imposed on oil companies operating in the South Atlantic region, and fishing cooperation was abolished. These were some of the actions that the Argentine Ministry of Foreign Affairs has taken since 2019 to cancel the agreement it signed Alan DuncanThe British Foreign Secretary and Argentine Deputy Foreign Minister – drunk or sober Carlos Foradori. Meanwhile, the former Secretary of State for Macrimo, George Forey, went to court to defend Furadori, but asserted that what Duncan had written in his diary “was not gallant, but clumsy.” He did not proceed in denying the negotiations at the British Embassy instead of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, nor did he deny that the talks took place in the basement of the diplomatic mission. Anyway, when the Pro-British Manifesto was signed, Faury was still ambassador to France, so he watched hearsay.

flights

as an applicant page 12, The Foradori-Duncan Agreement, relating to flights, is not in effect. From the outset, there has been a reaction from the United Airlines Front denouncing that the agreement was renunciation of sovereignty. However, the first LATAM flights from San Pablo to Malvinas were completed and the statement stated that they must stop in Cordoba only once a week.

The Todos Front (FdT) government, for two years now, with Felipe Sulla in the Foreign Ministry and Daniel Filmos in the Malvinas Secretariat, has started to stop everything by demanding that the daily route pass through Argentine territory, either through Buenos Aires. Or Comodoro Rivadavia or Ushuaia, in all cases operated by Aerolineas Argentinas. The British Foreign Office – under pressure from the islanders – flatly refused, so it refused No flight. In his memoirs, Duncan admits that for Malvinas, the need to link to the Argentine mainland is inevitable, because otherwise “there are no effective opportunities for development”.

petroleum

The Foradori-Duncan Agreement was clearly in favor of the United Kingdom In terms of deregulation of activities in the South Atlantic. It specifically stated: “It was agreed to take appropriate measures to remove all obstacles that limit the economic growth and sustainable development of the Malvinas Islands, including trade, fishing, navigation and hydrocarbons.”

Alberto Fernandez government launched Administrative sanctions against Chrysaor Holdings and Harbor Energy of the United Kingdom and Navitas Petroleum of Israel. Harbor, who had merged with Chrysaor, abandoned their plans and the Navitas continued. The sanctions were published in the Official Gazette on April 21.

fishing

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has suspended meetings to exchange information on fisheries in view of this The UK continued to unilaterally renew fishing licenses in striding waters.

The same is true of the question of scientific cooperation in the Antarctic. Moreover, London registered the polar scientific ship Attenborough under the flag of the Malvinas Islands, that is, it is registered under an illegal government, not recognized by Argentina. The State Department may take a step to revoke the validity of the Scientific Cooperation Memorandum and has already denounced everything in the relevant international organizations.

a respectful person

Former advisor Fury Duncan sent from a stunning suite: “It’s not a respectful personNo gentleman should treat someone he negotiated this way. A famous diplomat like Foradori does not deserve to be treated in a drunken insulting manner. In our terms, it was Guachada. The British themselves would not allow him to enter any English club because that did not happen among the gentlemen.

In fact, They have already opened in the Argentine Foreign Ministry a summary showing that the issue of drunkenness is not central, but the fact that it was negotiated at the embassy and not at the headquarters of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs., in the course of a totally inappropriate dinner in the cellar. There are eyewitnesses that similar scenes were repeated with other diplomats and journalists. In fact, Faury does not at all question the conclusions of the Foradori-Duncan agreement, that was the macrismo policy, what he does doubt is that Duncan revealed behind the scenes the venue and tone of the negotiations. This is not polite.