Publication of the controversial Science Law

This afternoon, at The Official Gazette of the FederationControversial Common Law on the Humanities was published, Sciencestechnologies and innovation, which were questioned by various members scientific community In terms of its content and method of approval in each of the Parliament As in the Senate.

The law enters into force tomorrow and, according to its provisional articles, becomes Science and Technology Law And the Basic Law of the National Council of Science and Technology, published in the Ministry of Finance on June 5, 2002 and “all provisions opposing this law are repealed.”

In addition, starting tomorrow, and in accordance with the Fifth Transitional Article, “all references in legal systems, standards, procedures, acts and other legal instruments that refer to National Science and Technology Council It will be understood as a submission to the National Council for the Humanities, Sciences, and Technologies.”

Also read: CIDE and two UNAM faculties join strike against Science Act

On the other hand, a period of one year is given to the new NPC for a new version organizational and administrative provisions According to the new law, in the meantime, those of Connackett would continue to apply.

Among the nearly 20 initiatives approved in the Senate at dawn on April 29, approval of the so-called Science Law It stood out because it was the only one in which the approved opinion was not published in the committees, as one of the committees was not completed and it was the one that received the largest number of dissenting votes (12), the reasons for the illegality of the law were said by members of the community.

See also  NASA is preparing to launch a massive SLS satellite for another Green Run test

Publication of the law is also the moment that community members that they are not satisfied with her and her consent procedure, they will be able to initiate their own legal protection proceedings.

of interest |

The academic movement grew against the new law of science

Academics: Science law ‘lacks legitimacy’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *